Logo Logo
///  >

Test : Canon EOS C200 review - skintones, Cinema RAW Light, Dual Pixel AF, handling and more

von Mi, 6.September 2017 | 6 Seiten | diesen Artikel auf einer Seite lesen



If you are already familiar with the Canon EOS C100 or C300, you should be able to find your way around the C200 very quickly. The first impression when operating it is how much lighter (1430g) and more compact in size (compared to the Canon C300 MKII) the C200 is..

The C200 fits perfectly in the hand with its (detachable) handle and the corresponding hand strap. We particularly liked the quick switching between monitor and viewfinder operation.

Whether you want to operate the camera closer to your body (and thus more stable) via the viewfinder or whether you prefer to operate the camera at a distance for fast movements or close to the ground via monitor: switching between the two systems is always possible and, above all, fast.

Both the monitor and the viewfinder show only minimal latency. For comparison: In terms of image size and imaging performance, we see the very good OLED viewfinder of the Ursa Mini 4.6K a little further ahead, but it costs extra and is not nearly as compact as the viewfinder of the EOS C200 and also has a little bit more latency.

As for classic shoulder operation, however, the C200 doesn´t show a strong propensity for it. Of course, it can also be tweaked for shoulder operation with external rigging, but in doing so it loses its compact form factor and there are other cameras that are already better prepared for shoulder operation - also in terms of weight distribution.

The C200´s peaking is one of the best in its class and can be customized at will. In combination with the viewfinder, the selectable viewfinder magnification and peaking, we always had sufficient focus control. We say sufficient, because even in largest magnification (even on the display) fine 4K-details are not visible -- but still they are recorded. A problem, which many Sony cameras have too. Perfect sharpness control in 4K can only be had on an external monitor via HDMI (since the C200 only outputs max. 2K via SDI).

With the menu overlays we would have liked to see a possibilty to position them outside the viewfinder image. And speaking about overlays, a false color function could be seen as standard for S35 cameras. We missed it at the Canon EOS C200 - waveform is on board though.

The Canon C200 offers a kind of dual operating concept: The menus can be navigated quickly with the mini joysticks attached to the handle as well as to the camera body. For focus shifts, the monitor can be operated as a touch screen. Here, however, only the focus is changed - all other functions are excluded from touch operation: a two-part division, to which one has to get used to first - but which certainly has potential for practical use. For us, this is a successful two-part arrangement - above all because the two joysticks plough through the menus very quickly and the C200 has many external function keys.

What we didn't like so much about the C200 are its switching times between 24p, PAL and NTSC as well as the somewhat too rigid play function. To switch from one standard to another, the camera must first shut down and then reboot. This takes a few seconds -- other camera manufacturers solve this better. In addition, you cannot play back clips shot with 60p when the camera is set to PAL. Those who frequently change their frame rates should keep this in mind.

The Canon C200´s fan noise is louder than that of comparable cameras, which is also something to think about - at least in quiet environments. We had mounted a Rode NTG2 on the upper handle and had the fan on the soundtrack quite noticeably. Our recommendation for quiet environments is to either work with a radio link or to capture the sound with a boom, keeping appropriate distance to the camera. Nothing you wouldn´t get a grip on - but you should definitely remember that BEFORE the first shoot with the Canon EOS C200.

On the other hand, we liked the C200´s audio monitoring. The headphone jack also works with minimal latency - something that other competitors in the S35 segment can´t do so well.

The battery power of the Canon EOS C200 proves quite durable. After 1.5 hours of On/Off operation for shooting our short clip, the camera still displayed 70 minutes of battery power. Not a bad value for the 3100 mAh battery from Canon, which is also pleasantly compact.

However, we would have liked to have seen a second C-Fast slot

Dual Pixel AF
Bottom Line

Canon EOS C200im Vergleich mit:

Listenpreis: 8925 €
Markteinführung: August 2017
Super35 / APS-C
Mount: EF-Mount (aktiv)

Platz 10 Wechseloptik-Camcorder / Cinema Kamera Bestenliste
Blackmagic Design URSA 4K
Listenpreis: 5659 €
Sensorgrößen-Klasse: Super35 / APS-C
Blackmagic Design URSA Mini Pro
Listenpreis: 6800 €
Super35 / APS-C

6 Seiten:
Exposure Latitude C200 vs Ursa Mini 4.6K
Dual Pixel AF
Bottom Line

[noch keine Leserkommentare] [Kommentar schreiben]   

Weitere Artikel:

Test: Panasonics Vollformat BS1H in der Praxis - die aktuell beste Box-Kamera? Mo, 11.Oktober 2021
Wir hatten vorab Gelegenheit zu einem ersten kurzen Dreh mit der neuen Panasonic Vollformat Box Camera BS1H und haben unterschiedliche Setups aufgeriggt: Mit diversen Cages und Griffen im kompakten Hand-Setup sowie am Ronin DJI RS2 inkl. Atomos Ninja V+ und SDI (!) Monitoring. Hier unsere ersten Aufnahmen und Erfahrungen mit der extrem modularen Panasonic BS1H.
Test: RED KOMODO 6K in der Praxis: Autofokus, Gimbalshots, Hauttöne, 6K RAW, Zeitlupe ... Fr, 20.August 2021
Mit der RED KOMODO hat RED seine bislang kompakteste und zugleich günstigste raw-fähige Cine-Kamera vorgestellt. Wir wollten wissen, wie sich die erste RED mit Global Shutter und Autofokus in der Praxis inkl. Gimbal-Shots schlägt und haben einige Überraschungen erlebt …
Test: RED KOMODO 6K - Das Dynamik-Verhalten des Global Shutters Fr, 13.August 2021
Ein Global Shutter Sensor kostet in Regel so viel Dynamik, dass sich sein Einsatz in der szenischen Filmgestaltung bis dato nicht etablieren konnte. Setzt RED mit der KOMODO hier nun neue Akzente?
Test: Der Sensor der Sony A1 - Rolling Shutter und Debayering Fr, 7.Mai 2021
Nach Canon mit der R5 versucht nun auch Sony 8K-Video im DSLM-Format interessierten Nutzern schmackhaft zu machen. Wir haben schon mal einen Blick auf die Fähigkeiten des A1-Sensors geworfen...
Test: Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera 6K Pro in der Praxis - lohnendes Update? Fr, 19.März 2021
Test: Der Sensor der Sony FX3 - Rolling Shutter und Debayering Di, 23.Februar 2021
Test: Wie gut ist Canons Speedbooster EF-EOS R 0.71x an der EOS C70? Mo, 18.Januar 2021
Test: Der Sensor der Canon EOS C70 - Rolling Shutter und Debayering Do, 17.Dezember 2020
Test: Sony Cinema Line FX6 - 4K Sensor Qualität inkl. Dynamik und Rolling Shutter Mo, 14.Dezember 2020
Test: Blackmagic Ursa Mini Pro 12K - wie schlägt sich das „Auflösungsmonster“ in der Praxis? Di, 8.Dezember 2020
Test: Canon EOS C300 Mark III in der Praxis: Hauttöne, 10 und 12 Bit (internes) RAW und 10 Bit XF-AVC LOG Recording …. Teil 1 Do, 7.Mai 2020
Test: Canon EOS C300 Mark III - Neue S35 Referenz in der 4K-Signalverarbeitung? Mi, 6.Mai 2020

[nach oben]

[nach oben]



update am 17.Oktober 2021 - 18:02
ist ein Projekt der channelunit GmbH