iasi hat geschrieben: ↑Mi 18 Nov, 2020 22:10
Filme sind schließlich keine Wegwerfprodukte, die man einmal zeigt und dann in die Tonne kickt. Die Verwertungsmöglichkeiten sollten eben auch noch in 10 Jahren gegeben sein....Ein Filmnegativ gibt das her.
Nochmal zur Erinnerung:
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=150899&p=1068698&hi ... x#p1068609
im Yedlin Video (ab 18:50) werden unterschiede sehr gut gezeigt, dabei sind Kameras wie Alexa65, Alexa XT, RED Weapon...oder 35mm Film in 6K scann und IMAX 15-Perf Film gescannt
in 11K.
Schau Dir das nochmal genauer an und Denkmal darüber nach. In dem Video wird gezoomt und die unterschiede gezeigt. Der Zuschauer zoomt aber nicht, warum soll er das auch tun? ;)
Und Arri hat sich doch zu mehr K auch irgendwo geäußert...? Also, dass 3.2K der Alexa besser als genug ist. Das hat was zu sagen und sicherlich nicht unbegründet.
"Above is a slide from the ARRI presentation showing an ARRI 65 MTF/spatial frequency chart. The readings are from a combination of the camera, lenses, optical low pass filter, sensor and image processing. It may appear complex but demonstrates that perceived image fidelity is not simply about resolution. At first glance, when objects are moving or appear only very briefly, your eye cannot perceive the difference between a 1K and a 4K image. For fine detail to be resolved at higher resolutions, your eye needs time to rest on the image. If the image is moving or cut too quickly the extra resolution cannot be perceived. Kraus pointed out that only if you had perfect sight and were sitting in the first two rows of the theatre we were in could you actually enjoy the benefits of 4K. Anyone sitting further back would not be able to perceive the difference in resolution. To get the benefit of 4K at home you either need to be sitting very close to the screen or have a very large 4K TV.”
...
According to ARRI, if you are filming in 2K or 4K at 24 frames per second with a 180 degree shutter angle (1/48th of a second) and the camera is moving quickly, the amount of motion blur means the image will look the same in 2K as it does at 4K. The only way to perceive a difference between 2K and 4K when the camera is moving is to use a higher frame rate and shutter speed – with less resulting motion blur. ARRI maintain that if you want to have higher resolution for motion pictures where objects are moving and the camera is moving, then you need to use higher frame rates for capture and display to see a difference. Within the industry, the jury still seems to be out on whether HFR material still looks at all like film and whether strobing artifact effects are needed for it to retain its film look. Kraus told me he was aware of the ongoing debate but added that if we don’t move to higher frame rates, then we need to end up with images that are more static, or forget about higher resolutions altogether.
"
https://www.newsshooter.com/2015/08/14/ ... e-arri-65/
Sitzt Du im Kino immer in den ersten beiden Reihen um nur das minimale an mehr K wahrzunehmen? ;)